State v. Lett

Defendant, appellant herein, appeals his conviction of armed robbery. The state’s evidence connecting him with the crime consists largely of the testimony of two accomplices, Robert Lee Nichols and Charles Lee Ison. It also included the testimony of Lois and Clifford Barrows, in whose home, it was testified, those accused of the robbery appeared around the time of its commission. Defendant contends that the testimony of these witnesses is so inconsistent as to be incredible, so that the judgment of conviction should be reversed upon the weight of the evidence.

The robbery in question was…