Commonwealth v. Espinoza
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
When Juan Espinoza, the defendant, failed to show up on the assigned date for trial in a District Court jury-of-six session, the trial judge declared him in default and, acting under G. L. c. 278, § 24, reinstated the one-year sentence imposed at a bench trial. The primary question on appeal is whether Espinoza’s default was a “solid” one, warranting invocation of G. L. c. 278, § 24. See Commonwealth v. Coughlin, 372 Mass. 818, 821 (1977).
The relevant facts are procedural. Espinoza was charged with unlicensed carrying of a firearm under his control in a vehicle (G. L. c. 269, § 10[a]). Twice…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Jose E. Panzardi Alvarez, A/K/A "Polo"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Aldoupolis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Osborne v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ParilloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. FeeneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994