Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Espinoza

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 20, 1989No. 89-P-623PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

When Juan Espinoza, the defendant, failed to show up on the assigned date for trial in a District Court jury-of-six session, the trial judge declared him in default and, acting under G. L. c. 278, § 24, reinstated the one-year sentence imposed at a bench trial. The primary question on appeal is whether Espinoza’s default was a “solid” one, warranting invocation of G. L. c. 278, § 24. See Commonwealth v. Coughlin, 372 Mass. 818, 821 (1977).

The relevant facts are procedural. Espinoza was charged with unlicensed carrying of a firearm under his control in a vehicle (G. L. c. 269, § 10[a]). Twice…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Jose E. Panzardi Alvarez, A/K/A "Polo"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Aldoupolis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Osborne v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. ParilloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. FeeneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API