Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Parillo

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 23, 1990No. 90-P-69PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Convicted at a bench trial in District Court of possession of a Class A controlled substance, heroin, with intent to distribute (G. L. c. 94C, § 32), of possession of an instrument, a hypodermic needle, adapted for the administration of controlled substances (G. L. c. 94C, § 27), and of assault and battery on a police officer (G. L. c. 265, § 13D), the defendant, after sentence,1 appealed to the jury-of-six session of the District Court for trial de nova. On August 8, 1989, the day for hearing of motions and trial, the defendant failed to appear as required after a luncheon recess of court.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. RamirezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. CoughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. O'ClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClermyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. PenaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. United States v. FlorentinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. ClermyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. FeeneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API