Legal Opinion

Interest of K.L.S

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 2007No. 133 MAP 2006PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice FITZGERALD.

We decide whether post-trial motions pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 227.1 must be filed in order to preserve issues for appeal in matters arising under the Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA), 50 P.S. §§ 7101-7503. We hold post-trial motions were not required under the circumstances of this case, and therefore vacate and remand.

On January 5, 2006, the Meadows Psychiatric Center sought the involuntary commitment to inpatient treatment of appellant K.L.S. by a petition filed pursuant to Section 303 of the MHPA.1 A Mental *1246Health Review Officer (MHRO)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In re R.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Coco Bros. v. Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Hua, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. In Re: M.B., Appeal of: PA State PoliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. In Re: Petition of: J.M.Y., Appeal of: J.M.Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. In Re: M.B., Appeal of: PA State PoliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Apex Comm. Federal Credit Union v. Arasin, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API