Legal Opinion

State v. Hoggard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1937No. 32,924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence for the crime of grand larceny.

The state charged and its evidence tended to prove that Jim Hoggard and one Jack Miller conspired to and did steal $600 from Ernest Wulfkuhle, a farmer who resided near Big Springs. Defendant and one Ketchum called at Wulfkuhle’s farm and told him they were seeking a pasture for three race horses, that the father of defendant owned the horses and would pay $5 per day for their keep. Wulfkuhle agreed to keep the horses on those terms, and defendant told him to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. State v. HoblSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. State v. TerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. State v. RansomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. State v. RansomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API