Legal Opinion

Hughes Tool Co. v. Williams

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1949No. Civil Action No. 3788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHT, Chief Judge.

On November 19, 1947, the plaintiff filed its complaint alleging in substance that it is a manufacturer of rock bits used in the drilling of oil wélls and is the owner of two patents covering said bits, being Letters Patent No. 1,856,627 and Letters Patent No. 1,983,316. The plaintiff further alleged that the defendant has for a long time past, and is now, infringing said patents by “making, reconstructing and selling” well drills embodying said patented inventions, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this court. That the infringement consists of the following…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  4. Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Gould v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robertson Rock Bit Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Hughes Tool Co. v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Robertson Rock Bit Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API