Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Wentworth

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before the Hon. Hardin Hart. The facts of the case are sufficiently indicated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

The only error in this case necessary to be noticed is in the return of the alternative writ of mandamus. The writ, if sued out in vacation, should be made returnable to the next term of the District Court for the county wherein the respondent resides. It was therefore error to make the writ returnable at chambers; and it was error to hear and determine the case at chambers and grant the peremptory writ. The appellant is in error, contending that a rule should have first issued on the respondent, ordering him to appear and show cause why the alternative writ should not issue. The alternative…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thorne v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fisher v. Mayor of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. BlairTexas Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API