Williams v. Hebbard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, J., pro tem.
This action arose out of certain deeds of conveyance made to the respective parties by a common grantor. One Armistead owned lot 37 situate in sections 4, 8, 9 and 17, township 18 north, range 8 east, M. D. B. & M., in Yuba County. On November 10, 1932, Armistead deeded to plaintiff the northern portion of said lot 37 by the following description: “A strip of land commencing on the west boundary of the Great Eastern Mine, at a point where the right bank of Willow Creek crosses the eastern boundary of said Nevada Mining Company’s Placer Mine and extending along said right…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Chapman v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Reiniger v. HassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Whitney v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Development Corporation v. KirkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Cokins v. FrandsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Manuel v. KiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Cokins v. FrandsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966