Manufacturers Auto Leasing, Inc. v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB McCOY, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Autoflex Leasing, Inc. (“Autoflex”) sued Manufacturers Auto Leasing, Inc. (“MAL”) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C.A. § 227 (West 2001). The trial court granted Autoflex’s partial motion for summary judgment and, after a trial, awarded Auto-flex damages. We affirm.
II. Factual and Procedural Background
On July 7, 2000, Autoflex, which is a auto leasing business, filed suit against three of its competitors, including MAL, seeking damages and an injunction under the TCPA 1 in state court after they allegedly transmitted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Toshiba MacHine Co. v. SPM Flow Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- State ex rel. Charvat v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Alton v. Sharyland Water Supply Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Powell v. WEST ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Carlyle T. Poindexter Poindexter & Associates, Inc. And Surety One, Inc. v. Insurance Commissioner Cassie Brown and the Texas Department of Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.