Moore v. Lillehaugen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in claim and delivery for certain cattle, in the district court for Dakota county, or for $1,450.TO in case delivery could not be had. The case was tried before Converse, J., who at the close of the testimony denied plaintiff's and defendants' motions for directed verdicts, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendants Lillehaugen and Lattimore.
Read the full summary
Action in claim and delivery for certain cattle, in the district court for Dakota county, or for $1,450.TO in case delivery could not be had. The case was tried before Converse, J., who at the close of the testimony denied plaintiff's and defendants' motions for directed verdicts, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendants Lillehaugen and Lattimore. From an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Action in claim and delivery for 24 head of cattle in which defendants had a verdict and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The cattle were shipped by defendants Lillehaugen and Lattimore from North Dakota to the South St. Paul Stock Yards in this state consigned to defendant J. R. Kirk Commission Company for sale on the market at that place. Plaintiff's alleged title and ownership of the cattle, or the proceeds thereof, was put in issue by the answer. It appears that the cattle were branded with the mark “LML,” and plaintiff claims to have purchased them in North Dakota…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Jones v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Fryklund v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Kaufman v. BarbourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Beseman v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013