Legal Opinion

Hibbert v. Mudd

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 29, 1974No. 53271PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

294 So.2d 518 (1974)

R. E. HIBBERT

v.

William MUDD et al.

No. 53271.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 1974.

W. C. Hollier, Bailey & Hollier, Lafayette, for plaintiff-applicant.

James Domengeaux, Domengeaux & Wright, Lafayette, for defendants-respondents.

Lawrence K. Benson, Charles A. Snyder, Milling, Benson, Woodward, Hillyer & Pierson, New Orleans, William M. Hall, Jr., Liskow & Lewis; Lawrence E. Donohoe, Jr., Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, Lafayette, for amici curiae.

MARCUS, Justice.

In this concursus proceeding, R. E. Hibbert sought to determine the ownership of certain accrued…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Melancon v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. Bollinger v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Brown v. Sugar Creek SyndicateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Pierce v. Atlantic Refining CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Ditch v. FinkelsteinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Matthews v. Sun Exploration and ProductionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Hanks v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Arceneaux v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API