Legal Opinion

Buck v. Baldwin

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided June 17, 2024No. 3:18-cv-02125Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM BUCK, R21689, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 18-cv-2125-DWD ) SGT. RIGDON, et al, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM & ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Adverse-Inference Instruction (Doc. 237). Defendant Regelsperger filed her Response in Opposition (Doc. 249), as did Defendants Edwards, Gardiner, Holle, Mallory, Phelps, Purdom, Rigdon, and Weaver (“IDOC Defendants”) (Doc. 251). For the reasons explained below, the Motion for Adverse- Inference Instruction is DENIED.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Larry Bracey v. James GrondinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API