Legal Opinion
United States v. Stone
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 25, 2012No. Case No. 10-20123PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*715 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY REGARDING LATENT FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION
VICTORIA A. ROBERTS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Joshua Stone’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony Regarding Latent Fingerprint Identification. (Doc. # 537). Defendants Michael Meeks, Thomas Piatek, and David Stone join.
The Court DENIES the motion.
II. BACKGROUND
Defendants are charged with: (1) Seditious Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 2384); (2) Conspiracy to use Weapons of Mass Destruction (18 U.S.C. § 2332a(a)(2)); (3) Use and Carrying of a Firearm…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Byron MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. AusbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019