Legal Opinion
Casey v. Uddeholm Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 21, 1993No. 92 C 2156PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOCORAS, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the motion for summary judgment of the defendants, Uddeholm Corporation and Uddeholm Health Benefits Plan. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
Daniel Casey filed this lawsuit seeking a review of a denial of health benefits. Casey incurred permanent and severe injuries as a result of being struck by a Chicago Transit Authority elevated train (“the CTA train”) when he dove in front of it in an attempt to commit suicide. Casey subsequently presented a claim for over $300,000 in hospital bills and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtis Reinking Carol Reinking v. Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company, and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company Ich Corporation, Curtis Reinking Carol Reinking v. Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company, and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company Ich Corporation, Curtis Reinking Carol Reinking v. Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company, and Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Gordon B. Phillips, as Guardian of James G. Phillips v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Senkier v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Life Insurance v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daniel T. Casey v. Uddeholm Corporation, a New York Corporation and Uddeholm Health Benefits PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Daniel T. Casey v. Uddeholm Corporation, a New York Corporation and Uddeholm Health Benefits PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994