Legal Opinion

Daniel T. Casey v. Uddeholm Corporation, a New York Corporation and Uddeholm Health Benefits Plan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 10, 1994No. 93-2970Published

1Opinion of the Court

32 F.3d 1094

Daniel T. CASEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UDDEHOLM CORPORATION, a New York corporation and Uddeholm

Health Benefits Plan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-2970.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Jan. 4, 1994.

Decided Aug. 10, 1994.

Michael R. Collins (argued), Harold E. Collins, Ann M. Morrone (argued), Collins & Associates, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellant Daniel T. Casey.

Thomas G. Hancuch (argued), Edward C. Jepson, Jr., Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, for defendants-appellees.

Before FAIRCHILD, MANION, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

1

Da…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API