Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 16, 1992No. Nos. 020-91, 021-91, 022-92PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellants were each convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit bribery. Punishment in each case was assessed by the trial judge at confinement for eight years, probated for eight years, and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals reversed. Ramirez v. State, 801 S.W.2d 110 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1990). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding no rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minton v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API