Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 25, 1990No. Nos. 04-88-00424-CR-04-88-00426-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PEEPLES, Justice.

Appellants were tried jointly before a jury and each was convicted of conspiracy to commit bribery. The court assessed punishment for each at eight years’ confinement, which was probated, and a $5,000 fine. In addition, appellant Carr was ordered to pay $18,000 restitution and appellant Minton was removed from his elected office. While the appellants raise various points of error in their separate briefs, each appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and raises other issues. Because we hold that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minton v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Randall Parks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API