Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Pool

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Roane County. Suit by Amanda J. Morgan and others against "W. P. Pool and others. Prom decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, President:

Amanda J. Morgan and husband conveyed to Pool a small parcel of land. By this suit they seek to cancel the conveyance as having been obtained from them by deception and fraud. Having been denied relief by the circuit court, they have appealed.

By the pleadings and proof it appears that plaintiffs did *535not own the land when they conveyed to Pool and would not own it now if the conveyance was canceled. Long before the conveyance to Pool, plaintiffs had allowed the title to the land to become forfeited to and vested in the State. It has not been redeemed. The State has the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Uthermohlen v. Bogg's Run Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. MathewsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lawson v. Pocahontas Thin Vein Coal Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mathews v. GlennSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Work v. RogersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Neal v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Armstrong Products Corp. v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jarrett v. OsborneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. Farmers Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API