Legal Opinion

State v. Mayor of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The writs are prosecuted for the purpose of reviewing the award of a contract by Jersey City to the Jersey City Water Company, for the supply of pure water to Jersey City for a term of twenty-five years.

Three questions upon which, in the judgment of the court/ the case turns will be considered.

First. Is the act of 1888 (Pamph. L., p. 366) constitutional ?

It provides “that it shall be lawful for the board of aider-men, common council, city council, aqueduct board, board of public works, water commissioners, township committee, town…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re New York, Lackawanna & Western RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. State v. Board of Street & Water CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  3. Board of Finance v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marcy v. Board of Commissioners of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Brewer v. RustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Brown v. PattersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. J. A. Kreis & Co. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ryan v. Mayor of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API