Legal Opinion

State v. Board of Street & Water Commissioners

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbett, J.

The certiorari in this case removed into this court for review certain resolutions and proceedings awarding contracts for asphalt paving in Jersey City, under proposals received by the board of street and water commissioners. The board advertised for bids for laying asphalt pavement, *274to be paid for out- of the license money collected by the city, as provided in sections 5 and 6 of chapter CXXXIV. of the laws of 1891 {Pamph. L., p. 259), and further provided for in chapter LXXXII. of the laws of 1893. Pamph. L., p. 164. Bids were received…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
  3. Feigel Construction Corp. v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. City of Maryville ex rel. Citizens' National Bank v. LippmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Greenberg v. FornicolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API