Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 1972No. 496, September Term, 1971PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

The Supreme Court of the United States has said that the right to a speedy trial is “one of the most basic rights preserved by our Constitution,” Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U. S. 213, 226, a guarantee “as fundamental as any of the rights secured by the Sixth Amendment,” id. at 223. But, as is not unusual, it has furnished little guidance as to the meaning and application of the right. Mr. Justice Brennan pointed out in his concurring opinion in Dickey v. Florida, 398 U. S. 30, at 40, that the Court has given scant attention to questions essential to the definition of the speqdy trial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Epps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. State v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. State v. HunterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Davidson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Bowie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API