Medina v. Arizona Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentEhrlich, Judge
I believe that the dispositive question on appeal is whether ADOT waived its claim that Medina was required to request a rehearing of its decision when it said in superi- or court that a motion for rehearing was not a prerequisite to judicial review of its order suspending Medina’s driver’s license pursuant to AR.S. section 28-694. In other words, the issue is whether the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies implicates a trial court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. I respectfully dissent because I conclude that Medina’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies deprived the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Herzberg v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Arizona Law Enforcement Merit System Council v. DannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Rosen v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.