Legal Opinion · Dissent

Medina v. Arizona Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 5, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 94-0147Published

1DissentEhrlich, Judge

I believe that the dispositive question on appeal is whether ADOT waived its claim that Medina was required to request a rehearing of its decision when it said in superi- or court that a motion for rehearing was not a prerequisite to judicial review of its order suspending Medina’s driver’s license pursuant to AR.S. section 28-694. In other words, the issue is whether the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies implicates a trial court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. I respectfully dissent because I conclude that Medina’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies deprived the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Herzberg v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Arizona Law Enforcement Merit System Council v. DannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Rosen v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API