Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Baca v. Helm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 1984No. 83SC242, 83SC245Published

1Concurrence

NEIGHBORS, Justice,

specially concurring:

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that the case be remanded to the referee for the purpose of clarifying the findings and to make additional findings, if necessary or appropriate. However, I disagree with the *479majority’s analysis of the issues of eviden-tiary versus ultimate fact and cause versus proximate cause. In my view, the court should make a determination that causation is either an evidentiary or an ultimate fact. The court’s conclusion that “causation may in certain circumstances be an ultimate fact and in others an evidentiary fact,” at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee v. State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Borovich v. Colt IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Voorhees-Jontz Lumber Co. v. BezekIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Tague v. Coors Porcelain CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API