Chisholm v. UHP Projects, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER and OPINION
DOUMAR, District Judge.
This ease involves the question of what is or is not admiralty jurisdiction in connection with the right to a trial by jury. It also concerns the question as to whether a plaintiff is entitled to a double recovery. The plaintiff seaman suffered a head injury while aboard a vessel in port in Chesapeake, Virginia. The plaintiff filed an action in diversity in this Court alleging that the defendant was negligent in performing services on board the vessel, and also claiming a breach of an implied warranty of workmanlike performance in the discharge of those…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chisholm v. UHP Projects, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Kilfoil v. UllrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Swearingen v. Yucatan Foods, L.P.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Phillip A. Chisholm v. Uhp Projects, Incorporated, & Third Party v. Sealift, Incorporated Ultra Maritime, Incorporated Wilco Supply, Incorporated Spir Star, Incorporated Kutting, Incorporated Spir Star Druckschlauche Gmbh, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- The Estate of R. Shane Adams et al. v. Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings, LLC et al.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2025