Legal Opinion
Phillip A. Chisholm v. Uhp Projects, Incorporated, & Third Party v. Sealift, Incorporated Ultra Maritime, Incorporated Wilco Supply, Incorporated Spir Star, Incorporated Kutting, Incorporated Spir Star Druckschlauche Gmbh, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 8, 2000No. 99-1018Published
1Opinion of the Court
205 F.3d 731 (4th Cir. 2000)
PHILLIP A. CHISHOLM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UHP PROJECTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SEALIFT, INCORPORATED; ULTRA MARITIME, INCORPORATED; WILCO SUPPLY, INCORPORATED; SPIR STAR, INCORPORATED; KUTTING, INCORPORATED; SPIR STAR DRUCKSCHLAUCHE GMBH, Third Party Defendants.
No. 99-1018 (CA-96-578-2).
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
Argued: November 30, 1999.
Decided: March 8, 2000.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge.
COUNSEL…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.