Legal Opinion

Driessen v. Moder

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The only question involved in this case is whether the evidence supports the jury’s verdict. The defendants by motions for a directed verdict and by motion after verdict properly raised this' question. We are thus required to state the evidence in some detail.

The case involves a collision between a bicycle ridden by the plaintiff and an automobile driven by the defendant Moder with the consent of the owner of the car, on which the defendant Insurance Company had issued its indemnity policy. The jury found the defendant Moder, who is hereinafter referred to as the “defendant,” guilty of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geyer v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. De Baker v. AustinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Feinsinger v. Bard. Feinsinger v. Century Indemnity Co. Feinsinger v. Irving W. Rice & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  2. Barrett v. Nash Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Kasper v. KocherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Frankland v. De BrouxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Basile v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API