Legal Opinion

United States v. Wiener

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 16, 1996No. Nos. 535, 725, & 1248, Dockets 95-1294(L), 95-1403, & 95-1597PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

Domenic Paciello, Reinaldo Roman, and James Brogan appeal from convictions and sentences after a jury trial before Judge Brieant in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All three were convicted of unlawfully receiving money from an employer in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 186(b)(1), (a)(2), (d)(2), and Roman and Brogan were also convicted of making a false statement to federal investigators in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. We have decided all but one issue raised by these appeals by a summary order filed this day. See United States v.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Demarest v. ManspeakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Usama Sadik Ahmed Abdel WhabCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. Louis DuclosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Kornman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. WienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API