Esposito v. Noto
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“ ‘Upon a motion to dismiss [for failure to state a cause of action], the sole criterion is whether the subject pleading states a cause of action, and if, from the four corners of the complaint, factual allegations are discerned which, taken together, manifest any cause of action cognizable at law, then the motion will fail’ ” (U.S. Bank N.A. v Stein, 81 AD3d 927, 928 [2011], quoting Maurillo v Park Slope U-Haul, 194 AD2d 142, 145 [1993]). The court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Maurillo v. Park Slope U-HaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Palmieri v. BiggianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sobel v. AnsanelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Palmieri v. BiggianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sobel v. AnsanelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012