Burback v. BNSF Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 20), memorandum and evidence in support of said motion (docs. 21 and 22), to which the plaintiff has failed to respond.1 Having considered the pleadings, evidence and memorandum of the defendant, the court finds as follows:
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff sues his past employer for violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981a and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 for race discrimination,, sex discrimination/hostile environment, retaliation and adverse…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moss v. St Vincent's Health SystemDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
- Wallace v. EbaughDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022