Legal Opinion

Board of County Com'rs v. Good Twp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1940No. 29131PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Oklahoma county brought this suit against Good township of Harper county to recover principal and interest due on certain bridge bonds issued by defendant, and maturing October 14, 1926. The bonds were purchased with county sinking fund.

Defendant pleaded the five-year statute of limitations, and the trial court sustained the plea.

Plaintiff sought by certain allegations and proof to avoid the alleged limitation, and in addition thereto asserted the county’s immunity from the operation of the statute. As we view the record, our determination of the latter question will fully dispose of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foot v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Herndon v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Freeling v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Oklahoma City Municipal Improvement Authority v. HTB, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. City of New Bedford v. Lloyd Investment Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Sears v. FairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API