Legal Opinion

Baars v. Benda

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1946PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The principal question in this case is whether the trial court was warranted in changing the answers of the special verdict, and this, in turn, is determined by ascertaining whether the record discloses any evidence of defendant’s negligence. ■ This requires an examination of the facts.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife and were guests of defendant on a hunting trip to northern Wisconsin. While the men were hunting, Mrs. Baars remained in or about the automobile. The accident occurred while returning from the hunting grounds to the- place where the parties were staying. The time of the accident…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Seligman v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Schimke v. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Wood v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bruss v. Milwaukee Sporting Goods Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. MatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API