Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Charles Maund Oldsmobile-Cadillac Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1961No. 10840PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Justice.

Appellee, Charles Maund Oldsmobile-Cadillac Company, sued M. W. Hamilton and appellant, Mary Jane Hamilton to recover on a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien on a 1959 Willys pickup truck.

The note is dated January 14, 1959, it was executed by M. W. Hamilton and is payable to appellee. The chattel mortgage is of even date with the note and was executed by M. W. Hamilton. Appellant was not a party to the note or the mortgage.

The pickup truck was purchased from P. K. Williams Motors on January 10 or 13, 1959 for $2,900 cash.

After the suit was filed M. W.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. MueggeTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Gleich v. BongioTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Kellett v. TriceTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Pioneer Mutual Compensation Corp. v. DiazTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bank of Atlanta v. FretzTexas Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Podolnick v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API