Legal Opinion
Meerholz v. Sessions
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, County of San Francisco.
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
The statement embodied in the record was filed on the motion for a new trial, and we can only examine the action of the Court *278below in denying the motion. As the order was entered by consent, we cannot hear any objection to it on appeal.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent, damages.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Fowler v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Brotherton v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Gibson v. BerrymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910