Legal Opinion
Brotherton v. Hart
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, County of San Francisco.
1Opinion of the Court
Terry, C. J., at the July Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court—
2ConcurrenceField, J.
In this case the parties, by stipulation, consented that the motion for a new trial should be denied. Having consented to the order, they cannot now question its correctness. (Meerholtz v. Sessions, 9 Cal. 277.)
Judgment affirmed.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Meerholz v. SessionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
4Cited by5 opinions
- Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- City & County San Francisco v. Certain Real EstateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Gallegos v. Kia Motors CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Gibson v. BerrymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910