Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered October 15, 2007, which denied plaintiffs motion to restore the case to the trial calendar, and granted defendant Ford Motor Company’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, plaintiffs motion granted and Ford’s cross motion denied.
Plaintiff originally based her products liability claim against Ford on a “transient signal” theory postulating that the Ford vehicle that struck her had a design defect by which electromagnetic signals from unknown sources and for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kathleen Madaline Jarvis, Individually and as a Parent and Guardian of Paul Michael Attila Jarvis, a Minor v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Speller v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Shea v. Putnam Golf, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013