Legal Opinion

Shipley, Inc. v. Long

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 2004No. 04-136PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case is before us on certification from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-8 (2004). The federal court has certified four questions to us, asking us to provide an interpretation of Act 858 of 2003, as codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 5-68-501 et seq. (Supp. 2003). See Shipley, Inc. v. Long, 356 Ark. 220, 148 S.W.3d 746 (2004).

In 1969, the General Assembly enacted Act 133, which made it unlawful for any person to knowingly sell to a minor certain materials considered “harmful to minors.” See Ark. Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Virginia v. American Booksellers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Ozark Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Kyzar v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Hinojosa v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Sluder v. Steak & Ale of Little Rock, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Ratliff v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API