Legal Opinion
Jan K. Voda, M.D. v. Cordis Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 1, 2007No. 05-1238PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal by Cordis Corp. from a decision of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma assuming supplemental subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 over the foreign patent infringement claims of Jan K. Yoda, M.D. (“Voda”). The district court established jurisdiction over Voda’s original claims of U.S. patent infringement pursuant to § 1338. In a subsequent order, the district court granted Voda leave to amend his complaint to add infringement claims based on foreign patents. Voda’s amended complaint alleged…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Carmen RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Salem Financial, Inc. Ex Rel. Branch Investments LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.