Legal Opinion
Catlin v. Sobol
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1997No. 5:86-cv-00222PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Presently before the court are three motions. First, plaintiffs have filed a motion for a declaration that pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) and •§ 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Edmeston Central School District (“District”) may not seek tuition reimbursement from plaintiffs. Alternatively, plaintiffs seek a declaration that if they are required to pay tuition that the District may not charge them for tuition from 1985-1994 at a rate in excess of the rate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great Valley School Dist. v. DOUGLAS M.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Great Valley School Dist. v. DOUGLAS M.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Z.Z., by and through her mother E.Z. v. Pittsburgh Public SDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016