Legal Opinion
Shemonsky v. Office of Thrift Supervision, Department of the Treasury
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 29, 1990No. 3:CV-90-0180PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONABOY, Chief Judge.
I
Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, brought this suit in federal court on January 29, 1990, after filing a document entitled “Application for Issuance of a Special or Preliminary Injunction, Ex Parte and Without Hearing”. Doc. No. 1. The crux of Plaintiffs grievance centers around the activities of the Office of Thrift Supervision (hereinafter “OTS”) and its dealings with Atlantic Financial Federal (hereinafter “Atlantic” or “the Association”), a federally-chartered and insured savings and loan association. 1
After determining that Atlantic was in an unsafe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. ex rel. First Louisiana Federal Savings Bank v. Commerce PartnersDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1990
- Neal El v. RayDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Neal El v. ValasekDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FriesenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Shemonsky (Michael R.) v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990