Ohline Corp. v. Granite Mill
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:
Plaintiff Ohline Corporation filed this action to collect the balance of $9405 due for window shutters delivered to Granite Mill. Granite Mill acknowledged it received the shutters but claimed it was entitled to an offset equal to the $9405 unpaid purchase price because Ohline had breached the parties’ contract by delivering the shutters late. The trial court, after a trial on the merits, awarded Granite Mill the offset. We affirm.
FACTS
We recite the facts in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings. State v. Moosman, 794 P.2d 474, 476 (Utah 1990).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Hart v. Salt Lake County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- State v. CoseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Envirotech Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Commercial Union Associates v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.