Legal Opinion

Ohline Corp. v. Granite Mill

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 9, 1993No. 920215-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:

Plaintiff Ohline Corporation filed this action to collect the balance of $9405 due for window shutters delivered to Granite Mill. Granite Mill acknowledged it received the shutters but claimed it was entitled to an offset equal to the $9405 unpaid purchase price because Ohline had breached the parties’ contract by delivering the shutters late. The trial court, after a trial on the merits, awarded Granite Mill the offset. We affirm.

FACTS

We recite the facts in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings. State v. Moosman, 794 P.2d 474, 476 (Utah 1990).…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  2. Hart v. Salt Lake County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  3. State v. CoseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Envirotech Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Commercial Union Associates v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API