Butler v. Duncan
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. Bill of foreclosure. Oross-bill to compel discharge of mortgage. Decree granting foreclosure and dismissing cross-bill.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.
No extended discussion of the facts is deemed necessary in this case. The bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage given by Duncan October 11, 1878, to complainant to secure the payment of a note for $5000 drawing ten per cent, interest payable semi-annually. The property covered by the mortgage was all the right, title and interest of Duncan in and to any real estate, situate in Michigan or elsewhere, which he acquired as heir at law or *96devisee under the last will and testament of his father William 0. Duncan. Duncan appeared, answered, and after-wards filed a cross-bill, setting up…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Winget v. RockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Boyce v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gottlieb v. ThatcherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1888
- Brown v. HallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1883
- Hayes v. HuddlesonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.