Echague v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
Re: Dkt. Nos. 153, 159
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
BACKGROUND
On May 19, 2014, I granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against defendant TriNet, and denied TriNet’s cross-motion; finding that defendant TriNet had breached its fiduciary duties under ERISA by failing to provide full and accurate information regarding plaintiffs wife’s life insurance policies. Docket No. 135. In that same order, I denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against defendant MetLife, and granted MetLife’s cross-motion; and granted defendant PCBB’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Greater Bay Flooring, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Herron Painting Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Herron Painting Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. SinnockDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Heat and Frost Insulators of Northern California Local Union No. 16 Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Rhodium Integrated ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.