Legal Opinion

District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Sinnock

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 6, 2021No. 3:19-cv-08262Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN Case No. 19-cv-08262-LB CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE 12 TRUST FUND, et al., ORDER GRANTING THE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 13 Plaintiffs, DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 v. Re: ECF No. 48 15 ROBERT CHARLES SINNOCK, individually and doing business as 16 NEIGHBORHOOD GLASS NETWORK, 17 Defendant. 18 19 INTRODUCTION 20 The plaintiffs — benefits plans and trustees — sued the defendant for failing to make 21 contributions to the plans required by the parties’ collective…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API