Legal Opinion
Moreland v. Meade
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 5, 1932No. [No. 94, October Term, 1931.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.
On the 16th day of December, 1929, Joseph E. Moreland and Mamie M. Moreland, his wife, as tenants by the entireties', owned a suburban development, known as Biltmore Earms, in Baltimore County, which was laid off in lots, and through which ran roads and avenues. The development of the property was under the management and direction of the husband, Joseph E. Moreland. At this time, one E. S.Eeal was the agent for the owners, in the sale of the lots. On the date mentioned, he effected a sale of lots Nos. 62, 63, and 64 to one William E. Meade, at and for the sum of $900. Upon the payment of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parsons v. UrieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Greenway v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Blake v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Miller v. BarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
- Mills v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. MessickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Baxter v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Clark Certified Concrete Co. v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- United Electric Supply Co. v. Greencastle Gardens Section III Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.