Legal Opinion

In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 31, 2015No. Case No. 5:10-cv-04809-EJDPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1126ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND INCENTIVE AWARDS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 65, 66

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge

This consolidated internet privacy litigation against Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) returns for final approval of a class action settlement. See Docket Item No. 65. Representative Plaintiffs Paloma Gaos, Anthony Italiano and Gabriel Priyev (“Plaintiffs”) also seek an order approving their request for attorneys fees, costs and incentive awards. See Docket Item No. 66.

Federal jurisdiction arises pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noll v. eBay, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Frank v. GaosSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Frank v. GaosSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API