Legal Opinion

Ming v. City of Jackson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1947No. 36432PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Appellant brought suit to recover damages suffered from a fall allegedly caused by the negligence of appellee in allowing a hole to remain in one of its sidewalks. From a verdict and judgment for the defendant, plaintiff appeals.

The declaration was in two counts, the first predicated upon negligence in causing the defect or suffering it to remain; the second upon a failure to erect and maintain street lights near the place of injury. The second count also carried forward the allegations of the first count. The injury occurred about 10:30 p. m. while plaintiff was returning to her home from a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Greenville v. LauryMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Meridian v. CrookMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Supreme Instruments Corp. v. LehrMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Hazlehurst v. MatthewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gould v. Town of NewtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Shideler v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  4. City of Biloxi v. SchambachMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Paramount-Richards Theatres v. PriceMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API