Legal Opinion

State v. Sumpter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 2009No. 06CR0158; A134017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant was convicted of first-degree assault, ORS 163.185, unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, and first-degree theft, ORS 164.055. On appeal, he argues that the court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the first-degree theft charge on the ground that the state presented insufficient evidence that the gun involved in the crime was an operable firearm. Defendant also argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a repeat property offender, pursuant to ORS 137.717, because the state failed to establish that he had committed the requisite predicate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BrineyOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API