Legal Opinion
State v. D.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 2022No. 21AP-118PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. D.M.,
2022-Ohio-108.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 21AP-118 v. : (C.P.C. No. 09CR-5355) [D.M.], : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on January 18, 2022 On brief: G. Gary Tyack, Prosecuting Attorney, and Kimberly M. Bond, for appellee. On brief: D.M., pro se. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas BEATTY BLUNT, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, D.M., appeals the decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his Motion to Correct Partially Void…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Ali v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Carnail v. McCormickOhio Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GaskinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. MatlandOhio Court of Appeals · 2022