Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2010No. 108297PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Kilbride, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

At issue is whether a State’s Attorney may recover a statutory preliminary examination fee (55 ILCS 5/4— 2002.1(a) (West 2008)) when a defendant receives a bail hearing but not a hearing to determine probable cause. We hold that the preliminary examination fee is available only when there has been a probable cause hearing.

BACKGROUND

The State charged defendant, Miles Smith, with possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) with the intent to deliver (720 ILCS…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rothgery v. Gillespie CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. People v. NichollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. MaggetteIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. DavisonIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Khan v. Deutsche Bank AGIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Maksym v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. PerezIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. VillaIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API