Legal Opinion
Amur Equipment, Inc. v. José Cardona-Fernández; Cynosure, LLC; Spark Medical Marketing
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided October 16, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01017Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO AMUR EQUIPMENT, INC., Plaintiff,Counter- Defendant, Civil No. 25-1017 (FAB) v. JOSÉ CARDONA-FERNÁNDEZ, Defendant, Counter- Claimant, Third Party Plaintiff v. CYNOSURE, LLC, and SPARK MEDICAL MARKETING, Third-Party Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Docket No. 56), regarding plaintiff/counter-defendant Amur Equipment, Inc. (“Amur”)’s motion to dismiss defendant/counter-plaintiff/third party plaintiff José M. Cardona- Fernández (“Cardona”)’s counterclaim…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Schatz v. Republican State Leadership CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.